🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.