🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.